Boo!
U.S. intelligence officials say the voice heard on an audiotape aired Thursday on Arab television is indeed that of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden. In the taped message, he threatens more attacks on the United States, but says there can be a truce in the war on terror if U.S. forces pull out of Afghanistan and Iraq.
Damn, just when we almost had all the sheep back in the pen, Osama speaks! ... And now, all the sheep go running for Dubya and Dick Cheney again.
If Bush, Donald Rumsfeld and Tommy Franks had done their job and not 'outsourced' it to the Afghan Northern Alliance at Tora Bora, we wouldn't have to be listening to Osama bin Laden as we are now.
"Outsourced" the job? Kerry said that same crap during the 2004 campaign, didn't he? Well, you don't have to take Kerry's or my word for it. You can get that information from Gary Berntsen, who was the 'CIA field commander for the agency's Jawbreaker team at Tora Bora' that day when bin Laden was allowed to slip away.
We wouldn't have to be listening to Osama bin Laden taunt Bush and spook the flock if Bush had not needlessly led us into Iraq. We've averaged around 15,000 troops in Afghanistan over the last 4+ years in tracking down those who were actually responsible for the 9/11 attack. In comparison, we've averaged over 150,000 troops in Iraq for three years now; and we've known for quite some time that it is not, and was not, a threat. How is that rational?
George Bush invading Iraq was the second best thing that could have happened to Osama bin Laden. The best was when Bush and Tommy Franks went with the Northern Alliance over our guys at Tora Bora.
Bush and bin Laden feed off each other. Bush benefits by Osama scaring the sheep--What? Do you think he would've been re-elected on his fiscal record? Or his negative job-growth record?
No,...Bush was re-elected because the spineless amoeba in this country out-number us. That's 'bout as simple as it gets .
And bin Laden feeds off Bush's diversion of our military's focus on him and al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan and into our quagmire in Iraq. Why wouldn't bin Laden and Bush use each other to the other's advantage? They each extended the other's career for at least another four years....
And as Jon Stewart said on the Daily Show last night, Osama. About your comment on the polls showing that most Americans want to pull out of Iraq? Yeah well, that's Iraq. We're still at 100% that want to kick your fucking ass in Afghanistan!
"I would not take my eye off of the goal: Osama bin Laden. Unfortunately, he escaped in the mountains of Tora Bora. We had him surrounded. But we didn't use American forces, the best trained in the world, to go kill him. The president relied on Afghan warlords and he outsourced that job too. That's wrong" John Kerry-third 2004 presidential debate;
Friday, January 20, 2006
Bin Laden's taunt personifies Bush's failures
Boo!
U.S. intelligence officials say the voice heard on an audiotape aired Thursday on Arab television is indeed that of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden. In the taped message, he threatens more attacks on the United States, but says there can be a truce in the war on terror if U.S. forces pull out of Afghanistan and Iraq.
Damn, just when we almost had all the sheep back in the pen, Osama speaks! ... And now, all the sheep go running for Dubya and Dick Cheney again.
If Bush, Donald Rumsfeld and Tommy Franks had done their job and not 'outsourced' it to the Afghan Northern Alliance at Tora Bora, we wouldn't have to be listening to Osama bin Laden as we are now.
"Outsourced" the job? Kerry said that same crap during the 2004 campaign, didn't he? Well, you don't have to take Kerry's or my word for it. You can get that information from Gary Berntsen, who was the 'CIA field commander for the agency's Jawbreaker team at Tora Bora' that day when bin Laden was allowed to slip away.
We wouldn't have to be listening to Osama bin Laden taunt Bush and spook the flock if Bush had not needlessly led us into Iraq. We've averaged around 15,000 troops in Afghanistan over the last 4+ years in tracking down those who were actually responsible for the 9/11 attack. In comparison, we've averaged over 150,000 troops in Iraq for three years now; and we've known for quite some time that it is not, and was not, a threat. How is that rational?
George Bush invading Iraq was the second best thing that could have happened to Osama bin Laden. The best was when Bush and Tommy Franks went with the Northern Alliance over our guys at Tora Bora.
Bush and bin Laden feed off each other. Bush benefits by Osama scaring the sheep--What? Do you think he would've been re-elected on his fiscal record? Or his negative job-growth record?
No,...Bush was re-elected because the spineless amoeba in this country out-number us. That's 'bout as simple as it gets .
And bin Laden feeds off Bush's diversion of our military's focus on him and al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan and into our quagmire in Iraq. Why wouldn't bin Laden and Bush use each other to the other's advantage? They each extended the other's career for at least another four years....
And as Jon Stewart said on the Daily Show last night, Osama. About your comment on the polls showing that most Americans want to pull out of Iraq? Yeah well, that's Iraq. We're still at 100% that want to kick your fucking ass in Afghanistan!
"I would not take my eye off of the goal: Osama bin Laden. Unfortunately, he escaped in the mountains of Tora Bora. We had him surrounded. But we didn't use American forces, the best trained in the world, to go kill him. The president relied on Afghan warlords and he outsourced that job too. That's wrong" John Kerry-third 2004 presidential debate;
WANTED
Dead or Alive
